Well, Flac is indeed bloat, but not sure if 320kbps Opus for 5.1 is transparent enough for everyone tho. Would rather go with the classic 96kbps per channel - or something like 448kbps / 512kbps for 5.1 (192kbps / 256kbps for 2.0). The file size different is small for a maybe better audio experience for some people. With ~512kbps I doubt anyone can hear a difference.

lol, lmao even

@eXmendiC 320kbps for 5.1 is well above the transparency threshold for opus.

Fuck lossy audio formats-if you're gonna tell me that I can't tell the difference between a blind listening test with the same music selection in 24 bit 96 khz wave and then in a lossy format I'll call your bluff because I've been able to tell the difference 19 times out of 20. So don't shitting tell me lossy is identical to lossless because it ISN"T!! Just admit you have a giant hard on for lossy audio.

>Fuck lossy audio formats-if you’re gonna tell me that I can’t tell the difference between a blind listening test with the same music selection in 24 bit 96 khz wave and then in a lossy format I’ll call your bluff because I’ve been able to tell the difference 19 times out of 20. So don’t shitting tell me lossy is identical to lossless because it ISN"T!! Just admit you have a giant hard on for lossy audio. still 0 screenshots..

Like I said before opiss is a LOSSY FORMAT and flac is a LOSSLESS FORMAT! You don't need dog ears to tell the difference between the 2.

>Fuck lossy audio formats-if you’re gonna tell me that I can’t tell the difference between a blind listening test with the same music selection in 24 bit 96 khz wave and then in a lossy format I’ll call your bluff because I’ve been able to tell the difference 19 times out of 20. So don’t shitting tell me lossy is identical to lossless because it ISN"T!! Just admit you have a giant hard on for lossy audio. aren't you the nigga who claimed to hear the difference between the 24 bit and 16 bit version of eva's audio on vanner's remux (and the 24 bit audio turned out to actually be 16 bit)